This week’s discussion looks at the role of an investigative journalist. In particular we are discussing the research methods and ethical standards that are involved in writing an investigative journalism piece, with reference to 2 separate articles from Richard Baker and Nick McKenzie from The Age, and American writer Paige Williams.
Paige Williams’ article investigating the state of poverty in Atlanta relies on facts and figures taken over decades. Williams has researched information that would come mainly from census data to establish figures such as: homeless rates, minimum wages and annual salary averages. Williams also looks at personal stories of local people living in poverty for which she would have had to research herself to by seeking out the individuals to establish background information.
Richard Barker and Nick McKenzie’s article in relation to the dealings of businesswoman Helen Lui and Australian politician Joel Fitzgibbon relies on photos, bank accounts, and personal letters and documents obtained by the Age. Details are not given on how the information was obtained by The Age, however the reader may assume that research from the story had been occurring for many years and that sources were thoroughly checked before the story was printed.
In investigative journalism, the study and research put into the article plays a very pivotal part in telling its story. A reader will only be drawn to an investigative piece if there is sufficient evidence to support the facts. With both articles the evidence of a thorough investigation taking place gives the story a greater impact for the reader.
I believe the article written by Paige Williams has been done in a very effective and interesting manner. In the body of the article the use of figures to start each paragraph reflecting a different fact regarding the state of poverty and homelessness in Atlanta gives the story a very strong and defining impact.